Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice - SPOILERS Thread (6,324 views)
|
|
Post by JamesMan on Mar 27, 2016 1:12:02 GMT
Who gives a [funk]?  Yeah Beej! It's such a stupid little meaningless detail just like giving out The Joker's real name! Nah, THAT is a stupid meaningless detail that people are getting their panties in a bunch over. |
|
|
|
Post by Blackjack on Mar 27, 2016 1:12:46 GMT
I can guarantee that Lex was Alexander Jr. just in case he was a disaster and then out of the shadows comes classic Lex Luthor. I hope they stick with Eisenberg though. With a bit of refining his Lex will be brilliant. I believe he is a Jr. but is still the normal Lex Luthor. His dad died around 2000 and some piece of marketing came out that said he "mysteriously" died or something like that. I think it's implied that Lex killed his dad so he could take over the company, like he did in the comics. |
|
|
|
Post by JamesMan on Mar 27, 2016 1:12:58 GMT
That was the KGBeast? How did that not click in!? Technically that was just his real name, his alter ego is never mentioned. In the comics KGBeast is all scarred and torn up, so who knows, maybe he'll return in a Batman film and want revenge for being nearly burned alive. Makes about as much sense as whats his face in Winter Soldier surviving a fucking building collapsing on top of him to become Crossbones later. |
|
|
|
Post by DEVLIN712 on Mar 27, 2016 1:13:57 GMT
There are so many people of Twitter (members of Botan's praise DC cult) who are viciously defending Batman killing in this film.
Batman doesn't kill. End of. It's out of character in any of the films that he does it in but BvS took it to a new level of extreme. Batman must kill at least 50 people in this film.
|
|
|
|
Post by Little Damn It Man on Mar 27, 2016 1:14:15 GMT
Yeah Beej! It's such a stupid little meaningless detail just like giving out The Joker's real name! Nah, THAT is a stupid meaningless detail that people are getting their panties in a bunch over. No! The Joker is interesting because he is a MYSTERY! Now we know his origin AND his real name. He's as interesting and cool as any other villain. Anyway I'm iffy on the new Batman comic. A YELLOW OUTLINE ON THE CHEST BAT?!!! FUCKING JRJR DOING THE ART? WHY!? I mean I like JRJR sometimes but he just doesn't suit Batman...and he didn't suit Superman. |
|
|
|
Post by Blackjack on Mar 27, 2016 1:14:40 GMT
Technically that was just his real name, his alter ego is never mentioned. In the comics KGBeast is all scarred and torn up, so who knows, maybe he'll return in a Batman film and want revenge for being nearly burned alive. Makes about as much sense as whats his face in Winter Soldier surviving a [funk]ing building collapsing on top of him to become Crossbones later. > Batman's a cold blooded murderer > Totally unrealistic thing happens in a comic book movie pick your posion |
|
|
|
Post by JamesMan on Mar 27, 2016 1:15:40 GMT
There are so many people of Twitter (members of Botan's praise DC cult) who are viciously defending Batman killing in this film. Batman doesn't kill. End of. It's out of character in any of the films that he does it in but BvS took it to a new level of extreme. Batman must kill at least 50 people in this film. *when 6 out of 7 Batman films have him kill or inadvertently kill someone* Outside of the dream sequence he supposedly kills the guys in the car and possibly Anatoli (unless they desire to bring him back) |
|
|
|
Post by Little Damn It Man on Mar 27, 2016 1:16:06 GMT
There are so many people of Twitter (members of Botan's praise DC cult) who are viciously defending Batman killing in this film. Batman doesn't kill. End of. It's out of character in any of the films that he does it in but BvS took it to a new level of extreme. Batman must kill at least 50 people in this film. Not that many. And most of them were freak accidents! Sure he dragged that car around but it wasn't his fault when it flew and crashed dudes! How was he to know those cars wild explode when they were shot at? He didn't kill that guy who was gonna hurt Martha it was the explosion that did it! |
|
|
|
Post by Blackjack on Mar 27, 2016 1:16:22 GMT
Nah, THAT is a stupid meaningless detail that people are getting their panties in a bunch over. No! The Joker is interesting because he is a MYSTERY! Now we know his origin AND his real name. He's as interesting and cool as any other villain. Anyway I'm iffy on the new Batman comic. A YELLOW OUTLINE ON THE CHEST BAT?!!! [funk]ING JRJR DOING THE ART? WHY!? I mean I like JRJR sometimes but he just doesn't suit Batman...and he didn't suit Superman. JRJR could barley draw a consistent suit on Superman FFS |
|
|
|
Post by DEVLIN712 on Mar 27, 2016 1:16:35 GMT
That was the KGBeast? How did that not click in!? Technically that was just his real name, his alter ego is never mentioned. In the comics KGBeast is all scarred and torn up, so who knows, maybe he'll return in a Batman film and want revenge for being nearly burned alive. Funny thing about KGBeast. He is one of the characters Batman undeniably does kill in the comics. He doesn't know how to deal with KGBeast, he can't imprisson him (he keeps escaping and killing people) so Batman just locks him in an underground cell without food or water and leaves him there. |
|
|
|
Post by Little Damn It Man on Mar 27, 2016 1:17:05 GMT
So Dev where you as excited about the first Flash cameo as I was?
|
|
|
|
Post by JamesMan on Mar 27, 2016 1:17:21 GMT
Nah, THAT is a stupid meaningless detail that people are getting their panties in a bunch over. No! The Joker is interesting because he is a MYSTERY! Now we know his origin AND his real name. He's as interesting and cool as any other villain. Anyway I'm iffy on the new Batman comic. A YELLOW OUTLINE ON THE CHEST BAT?!!! [funk]ING JRJR DOING THE ART? WHY!? I mean I like JRJR sometimes but he just doesn't suit Batman...and he didn't suit Superman. *continues not caring* Seriously, there were quite a few years when his fucking name was Jack Napier after the movies and I'm sure people flipped a tit back then. I don't know what this last part means but k. |
|
|
|
Post by JamesMan on Mar 27, 2016 1:18:27 GMT
There are so many people of Twitter (members of Botan's praise DC cult) who are viciously defending Batman killing in this film. Batman doesn't kill. End of. It's out of character in any of the films that he does it in but BvS took it to a new level of extreme. Batman must kill at least 50 people in this film. Not that many. And most of them were freak accidents! Sure he dragged that car around but it wasn't his fault when it flew and crashed dudes! How was he to know those cars wild explode when they were shot at? He didn't kill that guy who was gonna hurt Martha it was the explosion that did it! Well if Arkham Knight gets a pass when I fucking explode a car and shove it into the ocean I'm fine with what happens here. |
|
|
|
Post by Little Damn It Man on Mar 27, 2016 1:18:44 GMT
Technically that was just his real name, his alter ego is never mentioned. In the comics KGBeast is all scarred and torn up, so who knows, maybe he'll return in a Batman film and want revenge for being nearly burned alive. Funny thing about KGBeast. He is one of the characters Batman undeniably does kill in the comics. He doesn't know how to deal with KGBeast, he can't imprisson him (he keeps escaping and killing people) so Batman just locks him in an underground cell without food or water and leaves him there. So the same deal as when he brands the people. He doesn't kill them he jut males it near impossible for them to survive. And seriously? KGBeast he has problems with but when all the other villains escape it's alright? Double standard Batman! |
|
|
|
Post by Blackjack on Mar 27, 2016 1:18:51 GMT
I think the most irritating thing about Batman killing is that it would have been easy to show the thugs alive/have Batman do things that wouldn't have resulted in deaths, and Snyder was aware of it. He was aware of it and did it anyway. It would have been super easy just to cut those trucks blowing up out of the film and most of the [funky kong]ing would have gone away.
|
|
|
