Star Wars: The Force Awakens - Rumors and Speculation Thread (6,057 views)
|
|
Post by Blackjack on Aug 28, 2015 23:31:05 GMT
I know it's not the SW thing to do, but it feels like they should have gone out with a bang with a director like Spielberg. It would have been satisfying and fitting.
|
|
|
|
Post by YerDaSellsAvon on Aug 29, 2015 19:52:15 GMT
I know it's not the SW thing to do, but it feels like they should have gone out with a bang with a director like Spielberg. It would have been satisfying and fitting. Nah. You want a star wars movie. Not a spielberg movie. I'm glad they went with trevorrow he did a good job with Jurrasic World. and I'm sure he's more than capable of delivering a great finale to the "sequel trilogy" |
|
|
|
Post by Blackjack on Aug 29, 2015 20:10:14 GMT
I know it's not the SW thing to do, but it feels like they should have gone out with a bang with a director like Spielberg. It would have been satisfying and fitting. Nah. You want a star wars movie. Not a spielberg movie. I'm glad they went with trevorrow he did a good job with Jurrasic World. and I'm sure he's more than capable of delivering a great finale to the "sequel trilogy" Spielberg's always remained close to the Star Wars franchise (he was even suppose to direct Return of the Jedi) and the themes and tones in his films match up nicely with that of Star Wars. And despite a name as large as his, he wouldn't overshadow the film (similar to Indiana Jones). He'd be the perfect director for the grand finale. |
|
|
|
Post by Blackjack on Aug 29, 2015 20:39:34 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Blackjack on Aug 29, 2015 20:51:11 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Blackjack on Aug 30, 2015 21:22:22 GMT
George Lucas and Lawrence Kasdan JJ Abrams and Lawrence Kasdan
|
|
|
|
Post by Blackjack on Aug 31, 2015 1:08:30 GMT
 Each time I look at Kylo Ren I think about just how bad ass of a villain he should be. This is he first time since Vader that we'll be getting a consistent villain in the SW films! Unless you want to count Palpatine, of course, but he did everything from BTS and didn't fully go evil until the third film. Maul was a one off, Dooku (despite holding GREAT potential) was underused in Ep II and quickly killed in Ep III, and Grevious was a one off as well. |
|
Deleted
I have made 0 posts
Right now I'm Offline
I joined January 1970
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 31, 2015 3:32:22 GMT
Each time I look at Kylo Ren I think about just how bad ass of a villain he should be. This is he first time since Vader that we'll be getting a consistent villain in the SW films! Unless you want to count Palpatine, of course, but he did everything from BTS and didn't fully go evil until the third film. Maul was a one off, Dooku (despite holding GREAT potential) was underused in Ep II and quickly killed in Ep III, and Grevious was a one off as well. Hang on, was it ever confirmed that Kylo would be sticking around? |
|
|
|
Post by Blackjack on Aug 31, 2015 3:42:02 GMT
Each time I look at Kylo Ren I think about just how bad ass of a villain he should be. This is he first time since Vader that we'll be getting a consistent villain in the SW films! Unless you want to count Palpatine, of course, but he did everything from BTS and didn't fully go evil until the third film. Maul was a one off, Dooku (despite holding GREAT potential) was underused in Ep II and quickly killed in Ep III, and Grevious was a one off as well. Hang on, was it ever confirmed that Kylo would be sticking around? Officially? No. But it's always been assumed that he'd be sticking around for the rest of the trilogy because A) he's suppose to be the "new" Vader (I believe THR reported that) and B) He was apart of that large original cast from last year, and the trades suspected that most everybody from there would be sticking around and anchoring this new trilogy. It makes sense too, Driver = new Vader, Ridley = new Luke, Isaac = new Han, and Boyega = new Leia (?  ). |
|
|
|
Post by Blackjack on Aug 31, 2015 3:51:32 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Blackjack on Aug 31, 2015 23:36:16 GMT
When they release Ep. 7 on blu-ray, they better keep it in line with these  OCD will go flaring off the charts if they don't |
|
Deleted
I have made 0 posts
Right now I'm Offline
I joined January 1970
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 31, 2015 23:37:12 GMT
When they release Ep. 7 on blu-ray, they better keep it in line with these OCD will go flaring off the charts if they don't These are kinda old, though. Didn't they rebrand the Star Wars Blu-Rays/DVDs recently? I was thinking they look different now. |
|
|
|
Post by Blackjack on Aug 31, 2015 23:42:07 GMT
When they release Ep. 7 on blu-ray, they better keep it in line with these OCD will go flaring off the charts if they don't These are kinda old, though. Didn't they rebrand the Star Wars Blu-Rays/DVDs recently? I was thinking they look different now. Beats me. I have this set on DVD (the PM case has the same pic used above in the blu-ray)  Always assumed they'd keep using the covers at the top for blu-ray. |
|
|
|
Post by Blackjack on Aug 31, 2015 23:44:56 GMT
I wouldn't mind these either  |
|
Deleted
I have made 0 posts
Right now I'm Offline
I joined January 1970
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 31, 2015 23:46:02 GMT
These are kinda old, though. Didn't they rebrand the Star Wars Blu-Rays/DVDs recently? I was thinking they look different now. Beats me. I have this set on DVD (the PM case has the same pic used above in the blu-ray) Always assumed they'd keep using the covers at the top for blu-ray. At the moment, all I can find on sale is the Star Wars: The Complete Saga Blu-Ray (which I own) or steelbook Blu-Rays, which have a different design to those covers. |
|
|
).